College football · 2026

Season grade leaderboard

Every FBS player judged play by play against FBS opponents, updated after every game. How is this calculated?

Qualified: played in at least half of their team's games against FBS teams. Show everyone

Defensive grades use box-score stats, not play-level attribution, so they carry lower confidence than offense grades. Why?

#PlayerGrade
1Myles BradleyBowling Green98.9
2Andrew ZockToledo98.3
3Quincy ByasEastern Michigan96.1
4Ronn HardinEastern Michigan91.6
5Ike AckermanOhio91.0
6Scoop Gardner Jr.Western Michigan88.2
7Ahmed TounkaraWestern Michigan88.2
8Xavier WilliamsSacramento State88.2
9Logan GoodwinBuffalo86.7
10Tyler GillisonOhio84.4
11Roosevelt Andrews IIIMiami (OH)82.8
12Jaxon CherryCentral Michigan81.5
13Cornell EvansBuffalo80.0
14Zach JohnsonToledo80.0
15Zhaiylen ScottMiami (OH)78.5
16Austin AlexanderWestern Michigan77.2
17Joshua NoblesMassachusetts77.2
18Omari AborAkron75.7
19Aubrey MelvinMassachusetts75.7
20Makhi GilbertEastern Michigan71.4
21Kade KostusBowling Green71.4
22Korver DemmaCentral Michigan71.4
23JJ DouglasCentral Michigan71.4
24Nathan VanTimmerenCentral Michigan67.5
25Cyrus DurhamAkron65.3
26Caden CameseToledo65.3
27Lucas Lambert-PipkinToledo65.3
28Eriq GeorgeBowling Green65.3
29Zavian TibbsWestern Michigan65.3
30Peyton ChristianEastern Michigan63.1
31Hollis DirstineMassachusetts63.1
32Joseph OluwayemiEastern Michigan63.1
33Dakari FrazierWestern Michigan63.1
34Vann KavalsAkron61.0
35Aiden BurgessKent State61.0
36Ameir GlennBall State61.0
37Rex StinchcombBuffalo56.7
38Evan HerrmannOhio56.7
39Marvell EgglestonEastern Michigan56.7
40Nathaniel ChandlerToledo56.7
41Selah BrownBowling Green54.5
42Miles BaileySacramento State54.5
43Jaihien RoyKent State51.9
44Romando JohnsonMassachusetts51.9
45KJ BurleyWestern Michigan51.9
46Isiah ChalaSacramento State51.9
47Ben MarshBall State48.5
48Malik TullisSacramento State48.5
49Maverick GracioBall State48.5
50Christopher ClimesBuffalo45.3

Top 50 of 106. Pick a conference to see more.

How college grades work

College grades use the same method as the NFL: every play's expected points added, adjusted for how good the defense was, ranked against every other player at the position. The play data comes from CollegeFootballData.com, with ESPN's play feed saying who threw, ran and caught the ball. Four things are different.

  • Only games against FBS teams count. A power-conference offense against an FCS defense tells us little about either, so those games show in the game log but aren't graded.
  • Garbage time is left out: plays with a lead of more than 38 points in the 2nd quarter, 28 in the 3rd, or 22 in the 4th. Blowouts are common in college, and backups piling up numbers against backups would otherwise count like starters.
  • No win probability or completion-percentage data. The college play feed doesn't have them, so grades rest on opponent-adjusted EPA and success rate (the share of plays with positive EPA).
  • Grades and leaderboards use a minimum workload: every grade is a percentile among the players who meet it, so a few plays can't skew anyone else's. Per game against FBS teams, 14 dropbacks for quarterbacks, 10 touches for running backs, 5 targets for receivers and 3 for tight ends, counted over at least two games. Defenders need to have played in half their team's games.

Defensive grades use the same box-score impact score as the NFL's, minus forced fumbles, which the college box score doesn't record.